Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Mach Learn Appl ; 9: 100328, 2022 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851802

RESUMEN

Origin of the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has been intensely debated in the scientific community since the first infected cases were detected in December 2019. The disease has caused a global pandemic, leading to deaths of thousands of people across the world and thus finding origin of this novel coronavirus is important in responding and controlling the pandemic. Recent research results suggest that bats or pangolins might be the hosts for SARS-CoV-2 based on comparative studies using its genomic sequences. This paper investigates the SARS-CoV-2 origin by using artificial intelligence (AI)-based unsupervised learning algorithms and raw genomic sequences of the virus. More than 300 genome sequences of COVID-19 infected cases collected from different countries are explored and analysed using unsupervised clustering methods. The results obtained from various AI-enabled experiments using clustering algorithms demonstrate that all examined SARS-CoV-2 genomes belong to a cluster that also contains bat and pangolin coronavirus genomes. This provides evidence strongly supporting scientific hypotheses that bats and pangolins are probable hosts for SARS-CoV-2. At the whole genome analysis level, our findings also indicate that bats are more likely the hosts for the COVID-19 virus than pangolins.

2.
PeerJ Comput Sci ; 8: e958, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1811239

RESUMEN

For COVID-19, the need for robust, inexpensive, and accessible screening becomes critical. Even though symptoms present differently, cough is still taken as one of the primary symptoms in severe and non-severe infections alike. For mass screening in resource-constrained regions, artificial intelligence (AI)-guided tools have progressively contributed to detect/screen COVID-19 infections using cough sounds. Therefore, in this article, we review state-of-the-art works in both years 2020 and 2021 by considering AI-guided tools to analyze cough sound for COVID-19 screening primarily based on machine learning algorithms. In our study, we used PubMed central repository and Web of Science with key words: (Cough OR Cough Sounds OR Speech) AND (Machine learning OR Deep learning OR Artificial intelligence) AND (COVID-19 OR Coronavirus). For better meta-analysis, we screened for appropriate dataset (size and source), algorithmic factors (both shallow learning and deep learning models) and corresponding performance scores. Further, in order not to miss up-to-date experimental research-based articles, we also included articles outside of PubMed and Web of Science, but pre-print articles were strictly avoided as they are not peer-reviewed.

3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 23914, 2021 12 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569278

RESUMEN

Chest X-ray (CXR) images have been one of the important diagnosis tools used in the COVID-19 disease diagnosis. Deep learning (DL)-based methods have been used heavily to analyze these images. Compared to other DL-based methods, the bag of deep visual words-based method (BoDVW) proposed recently is shown to be a prominent representation of CXR images for their better discriminability. However, single-scale BoDVW features are insufficient to capture the detailed semantic information of the infected regions in the lungs as the resolution of such images varies in real application. In this paper, we propose a new multi-scale bag of deep visual words (MBoDVW) features, which exploits three different scales of the 4th pooling layer's output feature map achieved from VGG-16 model. For MBoDVW-based features, we perform the Convolution with Max pooling operation over the 4th pooling layer using three different kernels: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. We evaluate our proposed features with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm on four CXR public datasets (CD1, CD2, CD3, and CD4) with over 5000 CXR images. Experimental results show that our method produces stable and prominent classification accuracy (84.37%, 88.88%, 90.29%, and 83.65% on CD1, CD2, CD3, and CD4, respectively).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Algoritmos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Aprendizaje Profundo , Humanos , Máquina de Vectores de Soporte
4.
Health Inf Sci Syst ; 9(1): 24, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1274980

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Because the infection by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) causes the Pneumonia-like effect in the lung, the examination of Chest X-Rays (CXR) can help diagnose the disease. For automatic analysis of images, they are represented in machines by a set of semantic features. Deep Learning (DL) models are widely used to extract features from images. General deep features extracted from intermediate layers may not be appropriate to represent CXR images as they have a few semantic regions. Though the Bag of Visual Words (BoVW)-based features are shown to be more appropriate for different types of images, existing BoVW features may not capture enough information to differentiate COVID-19 infection from other Pneumonia-related infections. METHODS: In this paper, we propose a new BoVW method over deep features, called Bag of Deep Visual Words (BoDVW), by removing the feature map normalization step and adding the deep features normalization step on the raw feature maps. This helps to preserve the semantics of each feature map that may have important clues to differentiate COVID-19 from Pneumonia. RESULTS: We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed BoDVW features in CXR image classification using Support Vector Machine (SVM) to diagnose COVID-19. Our results on four publicly available COVID-19 CXR image datasets (D1, D2, D3, and D4) reveal that our features produce stable and prominent classification accuracy (82.00% on D1, 87.86% on D2, 87.92% on D3, and 83.22% on D4), particularly differentiating COVID-19 infection from other Pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Our method could be a very useful tool for the quick diagnosis of COVID-19 patients on a large scale.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA